attorneys

When no one is watching

I’ve always had a great deal of respect for the medical profession.

Unlike lawyers, accountants, Realtors, or even the clergy, the decisions they make affect life and limb. For doctors, ethical conduct isn’t just a means of maintaining the public trust; it’s an essential to their mandate of saving lives.

My doctor has this sign posted on her door:

 

 

To me, it demonstrates the importance of a values-based ethics system, over a rule-based ethics system.

In the end, we might be accountable to our clients and the profession. But if your values lead you to act ethically only when you are being watched, are you really an ethical professional?

What Makes a Good Lawyer – 5 Years From Now?

The Dutch law firm Houltoff Buruma is using a sophisticated computer game to select its new legal recruits. In “The Game”, legal knowledge doesn’t count for much.

What does this say about the future of legal practice?

More

Ethical or Unethical: An angry letter to the Judge

This session, the Supreme Court of Canada will hear an interesting appeal involving the case of Maître Gilles Doré.

Me. Doré is a Quebec lawyer, who wrote a personal letter to a judge complaining about how the judge had treated him in court. The judge then apparently then gave the letter to the Chief Justice of the Court, and the Barreau du Québec, which regulates lawyers in Quebec.

The Barreau suspended Me. Doré for 21 days.

Interestingly, the Canadian Judicial Council, to whom Me. Doré had also complained, issued the judge a severe reprimand, which suggests that Me. Doré’s complaint had merit.

Me. Doré appealed the Barreau’s finding to the Quebec Court of Appeal on constitutional grounds. He argued that if Quebec’s Professional Code, which governs lawyers, makes him subject to discipline for harshly criticizing a judge in a personal letter, then the Code violates his constitutional right to freedom of expression. The Court of Appeal disagreed, and upheld his suspension. Now, he’s taking his argument to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Me. Doré makes an interesting point.

More

Ethics without empathy

The University of Michigan News Service reports, depressingly, that today’s college students are not as empathetic as college students of the 80s and 90s.

If that’s true, it does not bode well for the future of the service professions.

More

In-house counsel and the loss of solicitor-client privilege: Update

In July of last year, I wrote about the case of Gucci America, Inc. v. Guess?, Inc. et al, 09 Div. 4373 (SAS), where a Magistrate Judge of the Southern District of the United States Federal Court found that Gucci’s communications with its in-house counsel were not privileged because his status with the relevant bar was inactive.

At the time, I stated that the opinion was deeply flawed, and ought to be appealed.

Fortunately, the decision has been appealed, and Southern District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin held that Gucci was entitled to assume its communications with in-house counsel were privileged, absent indications to the contrary.

This is a far better reasoned result, and one which better squares with the expectations of real-world clients.