Clarence Thomas, and the activism of spouses

Legal Ethics Forum first wrote about this issue yesterday.  The New York Times explores the issue here.

Considering that Virginia Thomas has been a political activist for decades, I find the timing of this story very interesting – there’s an election in a month.

The difficulty I see with this situation has less to do with Justice Thomas, than it does with with the lack of transparency in disclosing financial contributions to political organizations.

No one would wonder if Justice Thomas might be in a conflict of interest.  As it stands, we are left to hoping his conscience will be a sufficient guide.

There is no reason to suppose it isn’t.  Still, some transparency would be nice.

More

Complainants don’t need libel immunity

The Toronto Sun‘s Alan Shanoff argues that people who file complaints against lawyers should be immune from being sued for defamation. Which proves the old adage that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

More

Judge fines lackadaisical firm $500 a day for filing briefs late

There are at least three things about this story, which appeared in Law.com, that are interesting from a legal ethics point of view.

More

Is name-calling ethical?

Legal Profession Blog is predicting the dismissal of an interesting complaint against an Illinois lawyer.  According to the charge, the lawyer told an unrepresented opposing party, outside the courtroom, to “have a nice day, you piece of shit”.

I won’t hazard a guess at how the complaint will be decided.  I will say that if it is dismissed, it will be a dark day for the legal profession.

More

Is sex with a client’s wife unethical?

To my great surprise, there seems to have been some question in North Carolina, at least until this decision of that state’s Supreme Court, whether sleeping with a client’s wife might be unethical.

How could it not be?

More