Oil spills, personal finance, and judicial ethics

By now, most people know that after the sinking of British Petroleum’s Deepwater Horizon rig, and the resulting oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, the Obama administration imposed a six-month moratorium on offshore drilling.

A number of companies that ferry people and supplies and provide other services to offshore rigs challenged the moratorium in the U.S. Federal Court.

On June 21, 2010, Judge Martin Feldman issued a ruling that overturned the moratorium.

It’s since emerged that Judge Feldman has a number of investments in the oil industry, which has lead WSJ Law Blog to ask if he should have stepped aside.

Probably not.

More

Site hosting difficulties

Readers may be experiencing extremely slow site loading times when reading The Ethical Lawyer over the past several days.

I have just been informed by Network Solutions technical staff that they have received a number of similar complaints, and the problem seems to lie with their mySQL databases.

They are currently working on a solution.

I apologize to you all for any inconvenience.

How should a lawyer “be”?

In their paper, “Legal Ethics and Moral Character”, Alice Woolley and W. Bradley Wendel propose a very interesting way of thinking about theoretical legal ethics. While most of the literature on legal ethics proposes particular ways that a lawyer should act, Woolley and Wendel suggest that instead, legal ethicists should think about the kind of person who is likely to act in the manner prescribed.

This raises the question of what makes up an ideal lawyer: “How a lawyer should ‘be’”. It involves an examination of the kind of moral character, and the kind of worldview, an ideal member of the profession should have.

Considering that the some members of the Law Society of Upper Canada have been suggesting that efforts at promoting civility among members of the bar might make litigators “too soft”, it’s a question of more than just academic interest.

More

Obama to ensure BP is not “lawyering up”

I’ve always been suspicious of the phrase, “lawyering up”.  Maybe it’s because the people who accuse others of doing it seem to suggest that hiring a lawyer means you’ve done something wrong.

I am even more suspicious when the US President (who, it should be remembered, is himself a lawyer) speaks of ensuring that BP does not “lawyer up” on claims arising from its oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Whatever.

More